This is a good question. I would like to think of examples that show a single illustration of a point. I have done this more than once and it is always a challenge. I would like to think that the examples I choose are a single illustration of a point. It is very important that you make sure that the examples you choose are one example that shows a single illustration of a point.
This is one of those cases where I get really nervous. I am talking about examples that are multiple illustrations of a single point. I would like to think that my examples of a single illustration of a point are ones that are not just one illustration of a single point.
This is one of the reasons that I love the work of Jonathan Clements. I have a lot of examples of single illustrations of a point, but I know that there are a lot of examples that are multiple illustrations of a single point. If you are going to be talking about the topic of illustrations as a whole, you need to make sure that you are illustrating a single illustration of a single point as opposed to multiple illustrations of a single point.
There is a good reason for this. While there are many examples of illustrations of a single point, you have to be careful about the way you present your illustrations of the point. If you present them all in a single image, you are in danger of leaving a reader with a false impression of what the point is.
In a typical illustration essay, I write about some point that I believe is important and would make an interesting illustration for your reader to read. In this case though, I’m going to present you with an illustration of a point that is much more complex so that you can learn from it.
To get to the point of my illustration, I’ll use the example of the “toxic” effect of cigarettes. If people are smoking, they are inhaling toxic chemicals. If they smoke for several hours, that smoke will have a very different chemical composition and the chemicals in it will be more harmful to them. So, a single illustration of a point seems like a false representation of reality.
Sure, we do see the point of a single illustration of a point, but I don’t think many people think about it that way. It’s much more like a single illustration of the point of a single thing. For example, if I were to point at the ceiling and say, “It’s a very important point!” that would be true. It is a significant point, but many people would say, “That is a very small point.
A single illustration of a point is much like a single illustration of a point in a single book. For instance, in the Bible the main point of the book of Matthew is that Jesus was the Messiah. In the book of the Revelation, its the same point with different wording. Many in the Bible believed all of the other points of the book were secondary. This led some to believe that all the points were not in the book, but in the Bible.
For most of us though, it would be like if you were to tell us a point of a single illustration, but you would have to say, “There’s only one illustration of that point, and that’s this one.” This is one of the problems with point illustrations: the point is generally implied in the illustration.
This is because you are assuming that the illustration was in the same place, and unless it was written in the same way, you can’t assume anything.
