The title of this essay is a little tongue-in-cheek, but in my mind it is a serious thought experiment.
The author of the essay is a student at Columbia University. In this essay he describes a thought experiment in which you are trying to figure out how many times you can eat a banana before you die. In the end, he concludes, you can have banana for breakfast, lunch, dinner, and snack.
In my opinion the author is spot on. I think he’s right. Because if you’re going to try to eat a banana for breakfast, lunch, dinner, and snack, you can’t really eat a banana for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. But you can eat a banana for breakfast, lunch, and dinner for the first two days, and then you can’t eat a banana for breakfast, lunch, and dinner.
I think that this was a great point. You can eat a banana for breakfast, lunch, dinner, and snack, but you cant have a banana for breakfast, lunch, and dinner.
The point is this. We all have to eat a banana for breakfast, lunch, dinner, and snack, but we cant eat a banana for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. Because we cant always afford a banana for breakfast, lunch, and dinner.
Because bananas are expensive.
And bananas are bad for us.
If you don’t have money to spend on bananas, how do you eat them? You can’t. Because they’re expensive.And bananas are bad for us.
So if a person is living off of a diet of bananas and milk, they have to stop eating bananas. This is true even if they pay for it with money. So if they eat bananas and are starving, they cant eat bananas. This is true even if they pay for it with money. So if they eat bananas and are starving, they cant eat bananas. This is true even if they pay for it with money. Because bananas are expensive.And bananas are bad for you.
But seriously, even if you eat bananas and are starving, it’s not actually necessarily because of the bananas. If you are starving and you eat a banana, your body needs energy. So to eat bananas is not necessarily to starve.