how does this excerpt support the idea that the story is told by an unreliable narrator?

The story is told by the protagonist, who is the narrator of this story. For example, the narrator is not a reliable narrator as it is a “true story” and the events of the story are not recorded.

I like the idea of an unreliable narrator because it is a way to explore the idea of the story being told from multiple perspectives. The narrator, who is the protagonist, is the one who is most capable of being objective. We could imagine that the narrator is also the protagonist, but it would probably be more fun if the narrator was the one who tells the story.

The story is narrated by an unreliable narrator because the narrator is not entirely sure the events are true. By being unsure about exactly what happened, the narrator is able to show how much the events are true (and not just a story).

The narrator is also the one who can make the most compelling sense of the narrative. We all feel like the narrator is a person who is trying to keep the story straight.

This isn’t just an unreliable narrator thing though. The unreliable narrator idea is more of a “I don’t know what happened, but I remember it all” thing. It’s the same way we all remember things in our lives that aren’t true because we were kids or because it seems like something we all did but weren’t really into. I don’t know what happened, but I remember it all.

I’m not saying that the entire story is untrue because I dont know what happened. I’m saying that the narrator is unreliable because he doesn’t remember the story. The story doesn’t work like that.

The point is that people who get into trouble because they tell lies about themselves have an easier time getting out of trouble than people who are completely honest. The fact that Colt thinks he remembers everything he’s ever done is because he’s an amnesiac who has been in a time loop for some time. So I could say the same about any of our characters, and this is good because it makes the story feel more like a real life story.

In the new Deathloop trailer, Colt Vahn shows up to a party and gets drunk. So we see him doing the same thing we saw at the beginning of the trailer, only now it makes sense. In the new trailer, it all makes sense.

There’s a lot of interesting stuff in the trailer, but honestly, I’m still getting a headache from it. Because the story isn’t told by an amnesiac who can’t remember what happened to him, but instead by someone who has been in a time loop for some time, we end up seeing the same events in different ways, and we don’t get any insight about the character’s past.

The most recent trailer for Deathloop showed us a time loop involving a team of assassins and the visionaries who are trying to stop them. In that trailer, I saw a little bit of everything… a lot of what I expected, but a lot of what I didnt. The only part that made sense to me was the time loops part, but that wasnt the only time loop that they showed.