The story continues…I’ll make it clear that I am not here to judge a story. I am here to make sure that the reader knows what is going on. I don’t like to do that, but I do think there is a place for judging.
In a way, the narrator/narrator is one of the least reliable sources for information in a story. It is not his fault that the events described in a story happen to him. If he were to say, “I was doing some research on the time looping effects of the power of the mind, and I found this article that suggested that if you have a bad day you could wind up in a time loop,” it would be much easier to believe him.
The narratornarrator is an example of being “unreliable” in the first place, which is the same sort of thing as “I didn’t have breakfast this morning because I forgot.” The “reliable narrator” is the same way, but the narrator is generally more reliable as a source of information.
Narratornarrators are the least reliable sources of information I’ve encountered. For example, I recently read an article where it was argued that narratornarrators are not really reliable. There’s two things I disagree with in that article anyway: (1) They don’t know when to stop talking, and (2) they’re not really reliable.
One thing I do agree with is that the narratornarrators are unreliable because they don’t know what they’re talking about. Like I said, these narratornarrators don’t know when to stop talking. The best narratornarrators, the ones that I think are reliable, are generally people who know what they’re talking about, and who are very good at making sure they are talking about something that is important for the majority of their audience.
The narratornarrators can be very reliable because they know what theyre talking about. This is especially true if they are a news story or an inspirational video. News stories are great because they are often presented in a way that helps people understand the story better. I think it is a mistake to think that news stories are like a movie trailer or a TV commercial. They are usually a little more than a trailer and a little more than a commercial. They are a lot more than that.
News stories are great, but they do a poor job of conveying information. They are very much like advertisements, and if youre going to run ads on TV, you must be honest with your viewers about what youre offering. They are much, much more than just ads.
On an unrelated note, the new trailer for Deathloop shows that people are actually pretty intelligent. Which isn’t really a surprise. If you read the story, you will find out that the main character is an amnesiac who is being chased by Visionaries who have become obsessed with killing him. But the trailer is a little bit more light on details, like how the Visionaries get to know our main character and the fact that they are hunting him.
The fact that people are actually really smart is one of the most appealing stories I’ve seen from a game in a long time. The fact that the main character is an amnesiac, with a lot of knowledge about his past, is one of the most compelling elements. But the lack of details is what is making people unreliable. It’s one of the things that makes Deathloop feel like a video game too much.
I feel you, but I think its important to remember that the narration isn’t the whole story, and the story isn’t the only thing that is important. The story is important, but it is only half of who Colt is and what he does. So we need to give the player a little more information about what this character is and what he is capable of, because its not the player who is the star of the show, it’s the story that is the star.
